Current literature on the relationship between the global health regime and other international regimes focuses on negative externalities. Studies have shown, for example, that the trade regime, the foreign investment regime, the global financial system and the IP system reinforce health inequalities [21, 22]. These negative side effects have led to calls for global governance processes that better protect health policy flexibility . Mercurio B. International Investment and Public Health Agreements: Neutralization of a contractual threat. Bull World`s health care system. 2014;92:520-5. 1.78 Recommendation. Transport Canada should define environmental performance and meet the expectations that marine oil pollution prevention and monitoring programs can reasonably meet. The third type relates to clauses that require the parties to work towards the harmonization of health policy. Ten environmental treaties require their parties to adopt similar guidelines, methods, policies, standards or procedures. The 1995 Convention on the Prohibition of Imports of Dangerous and Radioactive Waste in Forum Countries and on the Control of Cross-Border Movements and Hazardous Waste Management within the South Pacific Region states that “the Conference of the Parties […] Encourages the harmonization of appropriate legislation, policy, policy and policy to minimize damage to human health and the environment at a high level of protection.” First, we see important links between the global health regime and the global environmental regime in terms of their principles and objectives. Environmental treaty negotiators often see the protection of human health as one of their objectives.
This type of articulation helps to justify global collective action on the environment. International Environmental Agreements (IEAs) are signed treaties that govern or control the impact of man on the environment in order to protect it. 1.120 The three departments responsible for implementing the five agreements we reviewed – Environment Canada, Transport Canada and Fisheries and Oceans Canada – unanimously stated that their pen-level responsibility was clearly defined and delegated. These include responsibility for setting performance expectations, monitoring and reporting, and verifying performance and taking the necessary steps to ensure that the results and results of environmental agreements are achieved. A signature is not the last step. Ratification by the state governing body is necessary before countries fully participate in international agreements.